Judge Lucy Koh asks Apple’s attorneys if they’re ‘smoking crack’
“Judge Lucy Koh continues to be going progressively terse with both Apple and Samsung because the trial continues, and she or he just let Apple get it after getting a 75-page briefing,” Bryan Bishop reviews for that Verge. “The document covered 22 potential rebuttal witnesses the organization might want to call after Samsung finishes showing its situation. Nearly shouting, Koh laid into Apple, asking why it might present this type of extended document ‘when unless of course you’re smoking crack you realize these witnesses aren’t likely to be known as!’”
Bishop reviews, “Apple attorney William Lee walked forward, saying “First, your recognition, i’m not smoking crack. i’m able to promise you that.” The organization’s legal team decided to pare lower the document, with attorney Michael Jacobs declaring that the organization didn’t mean to burden a legal court – which it genuinely thought it might have the ability to tell you all its witnesses within the time that it has remaining. Jacobs also stated that a number of individuals addressed within the document were Samsung’s witnesses, not Apple’s. Because the discussion ongoing, Koh increased much more frustrated, telling the parties the conversation will come at the fee for their trial time.”
Find out more within the full article here.
MacDailyNews Take: This really is some judge we’ve came.
If perhaps human IQs were 10 points greater overall. God’s cruel joke.
Shall we be calling a U . s . States District Judge stupid? Why, yes, yes we’re.
Judge urges Apple and Samsung to stay in front of verdict – August 15, 2012